Archive for perception

Communication Feedback Loop

The communication process really should be easy. You say something to another person. They hear it. They act in a way that is consistent with what you said. End of discussion.

And, it’s not quite that easy.

In reality, the process for spoken communication goes like this:

  1. You get a picture in your mind of what you want to communicate.
  2. You convert that picture into words, tone, and body language that describes the picture as you see it.
  3. The other person hears the words and notices your tone and body language.
  4. The other person converts the words, tone, and body language into a picture in their mind.
  5. The other person reacts to the picture as they see it.

The reason the real process doesn’t always go as smoothly as the ideal process lies in two key phrases: “as you see it” and “as they see it.”

The challenge in communication is that we often use words, tone and body language that mean one thing to us and something very different to another person. The difference might only be small, and still it is different. As the differences get bigger they can cause major miscommunications that result in wasted time, effort, and energy. In high-stakes or emotion-charged situations, even small differences can drive the conversation in a negative direction.

One way to bridge the differences between how you interpret a message and how another person interprets the same message is to include a feedback loop – you might say an understanding check – into your communications strategies.

As I wrote before, I am not a big fan of silver-bullet, one-size-fits-all communication techniques. I think you need to consider the whole situation before you apply any specific technique or tactic.

At the same time, I think there are some phrases and approaches you can add to your repertoire in preparation for high-stakes or emotionally-charged situations so that you can respond better when you are under pressure.

The communication feedback loop is one approach that I recommend in my private coaching sessions and in the communication workshops that I lead. In my last post, I wrote about the feedback loop in terms of how to apply it to make sure that you understand others more clearly. Today, I’m offering the other side of the communication feedback loop – checking the other person’s understanding of what you said.

In many respects, this side of the feedback loop is a bit more delicate than repeating back what you heard. In this case, you are going to ask the other person to tell you what message they received from your communication effort. Done poorly, asking the other person what they heard can come across as condescending or aggressive. So, you have to work extra hard to add more words, to soften your tone, and to choose non-threatening body language to make this work.

Here are six questions you can use to make sure you have communicated effectively:

  • “Would you please say what you heard me say, so I can be sure that I was clear?”
  • “So that I can make sure I communicated clearly, would you please tell me what you heard me say?”
  • “I just want to make sure that I am clear. Would you please tell me what you understood me to say?”
  • “I’d like to make sure I said that clearly. Please tell me what you heard?”
  • “I’m not sure that I am conveying my idea the best way. What have you heard me say?”
  • “I may have said that in a way that does not really communicate what I’m trying to say. If I did, I’d like a chance to rephrase it. What message did you hear?”

As I suggested in my post about the Five Questions to Make Sure that You Understand Others Correctly, I offer this list as a starting point for you to develop your own. As you develop your list, remember the underlying idea – if there was a miscommunication of any kind, you take the responsibility.

I’d love to see ideas you have for other ways to check understanding. Please add them in the comments section.

Have you ever taken an action – either immediately or at some later time – based on what you heard someone say only to find out after you acted (or spoke) that you did not accurately understand their statement or request?

So far, everyone I have asked this question in a face-to-face conversation answers pretty much the same way. In effect, they all say: “Yes, of course I have.” And, the truth is, so have I.

As the Irish playwright, George Bernard Shaw, said:

“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”

The illusion that you accurately understand another person’s intended message based solely on your interpretation of his words, tone and body language is a trap that can hinder your desire to become a truly remarkable communicator. You certainly have an interpretation of what he intended to say, and you never really know if you understand correctly until you confirm it with him. Confirming mutual understanding is the feedback loop often missing in situations that lead to misunderstanding and frustration.

When you develop the ability to check your own understanding of the messages you interpret from what another person says by consciously inserting a feedback loop, you improve the odds of effectively communicating with her. Well phrased confirmation questions can help you do this gracefully and with ease to improve the odds that you get positive replies rather than snarky comebacks.

Here are five ways you can phrase a confirmation question:

  •  “Let me say back to you what I think you just said, so that I can be sure I understood you correctly…”
  • “Please correct me if I am wrong. I understood you to say ________. Is that correct?”
  • “If I hear you correctly, you are saying _____________. Is that right?”
  • “I hear you saying ____________. Is that right?”
  • “It sounds to me like you feel/think ____________. Did I understand you correctly?”

If you look closely at each question, you will see a common thought:  if a miscommunication happened, it’s my problem and not the other person’s.

You can probably find other ways to express the same idea, and I encourage you to do so. You do not want to say the same thing over and over again in the same conversation to the point that you sound like an inauthentic automaton.

This list is a good place to start your own list of confirmation questions.  I suggest that you think of others to add to your communication toolkit so that you can have many of them to pull on when you find yourself in the middle of a high-stakes conversation.

If you have other ways of confirming that you understood correctly, please add them in the comments section below.

Sometimes, life gets messy — as shown by the picture of the living area in my home this morning.

When I first walked through this area on my way to get a cup of coffee and some breakfast, I felt a bit stressed.

My family was still asleep, and I had a full day of work planned in my home office. The mess felt a bit overwhelming and out of control.

If you look carefully by the rocking chair near the middle of the picture, you will see an insulated coffee cup. That cup represents the time I spent reading, reflecting, and planning before starting my day.

My morning reading included Today We Are Rich by Tim Sanders, and my reflection included writing in my Gratefulness Journal (an idea I got from the book).

As I wrote a list of things for which I am grateful, I looked around the mess in my home, and I saw evidence of:

  • One daughter’s recent high school graduation and the celebration that followed
  • Another daughter’s four day HOBY leadership seminar experience
  • Two daughters who love listening to and playing music
  • My dad’s hastily celebrated birthday while my parents visited our home for graduation ceremonies
  • A community service project that my wife helped to organize
  • A wife who worked hard to keep up with laundry during the last three action-packed weeks
  • The opportunity that my wife and I had to work at the HOBY leadership seminar
  • People who came home at the end of long days of serving and working with others too tired to put away the mess
  • Business projects and opportunities that I have worked on while my wife kept everything else moving forward

As I re-framed my view of the mess in terms of the lives, relationships, and experiences that it represented, it transformed from stressful to soothing.

The lesson in this for leaders is to, at least for a short time, embrace messiness because of what the mess represents.

Your mess might by physical, like the one in my home this morning, or more intangible, like a long to-do list or a hectic project schedule. In either case, learn to embrace the temporary disarray, disorganization, and messiness because of the growth and progress it represents.

You can’t live with the mess forever — eventually you’ll have to clean it up. In the meantime though, find a way to frame it positively so that you can find the energy and enthusiasm to lead positively.

Now, I think I’ll go take another look at the mess and the memories it represents before my wife and kids get it cleaned-up.

Two questions I often get in workshops, from coaching clients, and in consulting engagements are:

  1. How do I work with an unmotivated person? and
  2. How do I motivate someone to work harder?

Here are the quick answers:

  1. There is no such thing as an unmotivated person. Everyone is motivated to do something. Therefore, everyone is motivated.
  2. You cannot motivate someone else to work harder. You can find what is important to them — what motivates them — and then find ways to make sure they get more of that as a reward for high-level performance.

According to this model for understanding what motivates behavior, behaviors come from our choices about what he hope to experience (in some cases what we hope to avoid experiencing). So, the key to “motivating” another person is knowing what they view as a reward for working hard or doing a certain behavior. (No, I did not change my mind about your ability to motivate someone else. I’m just using the word in a figurative sense.)

As a leader working to influence the behavior of other people, here are three clues you can look for to know what motivates them to high-level performance

  1. Their personal lives
    Their hobbies and other outside work activities are clues to what they enjoy and what might motivate them to behave in certain ways or to achieve great results.
  2. Their DISC behavior style
    When you understand their behavioral style, you have at least partial insight into their needs and desires. When you understand another person’s needs and desires, you have good clues about what they might view as a positive motivator.
  3. The tasks they like to do at work
    Sometimes, you can let people do what they would prefer to do after they accomplish what they don’t want to do so that the preferred task becomes a type of reward. This approach is sometimes called Grandma’s Law: “You can have desert after you eat your broccoli.”

Over the next few posts I’ll elaborate on each of these three clues to offer some practical application tips.

Photo by Julie Rybarczyk.

This article is from the Motivation series. Use the links below to read more from this series.

5 Categories : Leadership Skills


People frequently ask me why I use the DISC model in my work. Today, I’ll offer some of my reasons.

I use the DISC model because:

  • It is simple enough that…
    • I can work with someone for only a few minutes and help them gain perspective they have never seen before.
    • I can use it to help me when I am tired, stressed or angry.
    • I don’t need assessment results to understand another person.
  • It is descriptive enough that…
    • It helps me to see others more objectively and less subjectively.
    • It leads me towards understanding and away from judgment.
  • It is accurate enough that…
    • I can get a good guess about what someone wants from me when we communicate.
    • I can quickly understand another person’s perspective.
  • It is flexible enough that…
    • I can use it “on the fly” in real-life situations.
    • I can see the blends, subtleties and variations in other people’s perspectives without trying to force them neatly into a single box or label them.

Is the model perfect? No.

Does the model explain every nuance of human behavior? No.

Are there better clinical or analytical models? Yes.

Despite these limitations, for real-world, working-with-people-in-the-moment situations, it is the best tool for me.

These are the reasons that I use the DISC model.